Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) | Hansard source

If I understand your ruling from earlier—unless that is now being altered—it is that, as a consequence of what I might call the chapeau and paragraph (a) being voted against, paragraph (b) is no longer operative, in which case there is no further amendment to be put. We then moved to the substantive motion moved by Senator Cormann, and I understand Senator Di Natale has reserved the Greens' position to vote against the substantive motion, which has, in effect, the same political position. Am I right?