Senate debates

Tuesday, 11 August 2026

Committees

Environment and Communications References Committee; Reference

6:13 pm

Photo of Steph Hodgins-MaySteph Hodgins-May (Victoria, Australian Greens) | Hansard source

Well, here we go again—another day in this parliament, another game of 'guess who this government is working for'. Whether it's gambling reform, whether it's taxing our gas exports or whether it's this issue—multinational gas and other fossil fuel companies infiltrating our schools, our early learning centres and our public institutions to brainwash our kids—the answer is that this government is not working for you and it is not working for those families and teachers who are incredulous that this has been permitted to occur under this government's watch.

When we first got wind of the fact that fossil fuel corporations—coal and gas corporations—were being allowed to brainwash children as young as six months old in early learning centres, we were stunned. Surely Labor would be as outraged as we were that this was being permitted to happen in our childcare centres and schools? Sadly, no—or, if they were shocked or disgusted, they hid it incredibly well.

Now we are back in this place and we are giving Labor another shot to show who they are here to represent. Are they here to represent the gambling lobby that donates to them? Are they here to represent the fossil fuel industry that donates to them? Or are they here to represent Australian families and children? Labor will have a very, very simple choice in front of them in a matter of minutes: to support an inquiry into the influence of multinational coal and gas corporations on Australian children, or not to. That is the proposition that we are here to talk about today. It's a pretty simple one.

It's a chance to ask some very basic questions of these fossil fuel polluters, of the education system, of the experts who know and understand the impacts of brainwashing children as young as six months old. How much money are fossil fuel corporations spending to influence children? How many programs are they running? How many schools? How many early learning centres? How many sporting clubs? How many community organisations? Perhaps most importantly, why are they running these programs? We've got a pretty good idea of why we think they are, but let's hear from them. Why are they running these programs in our schools? What is the end goal of these investments? What are the impacts on our kids?

Let's be clear; that is what we are talking about. We are talking about business investments from multinational coal and gas corporations designed to get into our early learning centres and our schools to brainwash our children and to buy social licence because they know their social licence is on the brink. They know Australians have had a gutful of being ripped off in the great Australian gas rip-off. Now they're trying to build social licence amongst children as young as six months old. Come on! How can anyone hear this and not act? How can anyone hear this and not support an inquiry into this absolute travesty?

I just cannot compute, as the mother of a three-year old, imagining my child coming home with a Santos drink bottle and being told that the very climate impacts that my child is going to have to endure are as much their responsibility to prevent as it is for these fossil fuel corporations that are brainwashing them. How do you keep a straight face? How do you keep on going in this role as family members? I just can't compute.

They do it because they understand the value of getting in early—future customers, future workers, future voters, future communities hooked on fossil fuels instead of transitioning to clean and secure energy. And these are the future generations who will have to live with the consequences of the climate crisis their industry is driving. They want to shape the story before kids are old enough to critically examine it and question it for themselves. They want to tell them: 'We're not the bad guys. Don't look too closely. Don't ask who's causing the climate crisis. Don't trust the science. Here, have a beanie. Have a cap. Have a drink bottle. We're the good guys.' Bullshit.

During the past weeks, I've heard from families and communities across this country—I withdraw.

Comments

No comments