Nick McKim (Tasmania, Australian Greens) Share this | Hansard source

It is, again, on relevance, Mr President. In regard to your first ruling that the second part of my question was, 'How can you possibly justify this expenditure?'—that is, the expenditure that I referred to in the first part of my supplementary question—I would put to you, respectfully, that, in fact, it's quite a tightly worded question and the minister is not being relevant to it.