Penny Wong (SA, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) | Hansard source

As I understand the point of order, the point of order is that there is a name in the question. The second accusation, which I do not believe is a point of order, is a suggestion that this is somehow fabricated. I'll make it clear it is not. The name is included because it is a name of a person, and we are asking questions about his circumstances and why it is that the services in a so-called demand-driven system are not being provided to him.