Order! Senator Cormann, that is not a point of order, the second part of your commentary. On the point of order, Senator Wong, I believe the question could've legitimately been interpreted both ways as there was a lot of noise in the chamber when it was being asked. When I ruled on the earlier point of order, I did clarify it—'Has the minister discussed' were the words I used. I draw the minister's attention to the question, but she's free to continue her answer.