Rachel Siewert (WA, Australian Greens) Share this | Hansard source

With all due respect, you did not answer my question. I asked why you do not think this process would be orderly if one of the reasons for not supporting it is that you wanted an orderly process and you promised an orderly process. One of the issues that you raised in response to my previous question was the nominal expiry date. Can you confirm that in some instances the nominal expiry date is in fact 2013? So you are talking about a considerable period of time between now and the nominal expiry date before these employees can be covered.