I am just seeking clarification, Chair. I am very happy to reinsert ‘the Minister’. I thought it was a big mistake to take ‘the Minister’ out earlier, so putting ‘the Minister’ back is very desirable; but what I would like to know is how clause 5(3) now reads in its entirety. Is it as follows:

Infrastructure Australia is to perform a function under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a), (b), (e), (f) or (i) …

Could somebody read me the entire subclause (3), please, so that I can see what the amendment will do.