Senate debates

Friday, 23 March 2007

Native Title Amendment Bill 2006

In Committee

1:29 pm

Photo of Rachel SiewertRachel Siewert (WA, Australian Greens) Share this | Hansard source

I know you think that the mining industry is quite happy with it, but I can quote to you from the Minerals Council of Australia submission, where they say:

The additional measures have the potential to divert already limited resources towards bureaucratic processes, unnecessarily onerous compliance obligations or the winding-up and establishment of new services ...

They go on to say:

... such organisational changes can add significant delays and additional costs to industry in:

> suspending existing negotiations;

> requiring the renegotiation of certain matters previously agreed upon;

> requiring the building of new relationships with new NTRB staff; and

> requiring new NTRB staff to acquaint themselves with the particular matter and the relevant native title holder/claimant group.

Unless they have changed their minds since they put in the submission to the Senate inquiry, those are the comments of the Minerals Council of Australia.

Comments

No comments