Amanda Vanstone (SA, Liberal Party, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs) Share this | Hansard source

I am tempted to say something about the other side, but I will leave that. The number of skilled migrants under state and territory sponsored categories has been dramatically increasing. In my own state of South Australia it has gone from 750 in 2001 to almost 8,200 in 2005-06; and in Victoria, from 1,827 in 2001 to 10,500 in 2005-06. These states are star performers at recognising an opportunity to work with the Australian government, taking that opportunity, putting their political differences aside and getting on with it. The states and territories are also big users of 457 visas. Almost 10 per cent of all temporary skilled migrants in 2006 were for state and territory governments or instrumentalities. They are helping business and industry sustain and increase productivity growth.

The flexible system allows changing demands for skills to be met. The MODL, the migration occupations in demand list, is something that is updated every six months, and senators will understand that you get extra points for having particular skills, but if you have the migration occupation in demand skills you get extra points again. Last month we added childcare coordinators, which we thought was a good idea. It allows priority processing of applications for people with that skill—more points and priority processing—to help that industry meet the need.

Mr Beazley called it an absolute disgrace and a short-sighted move that this is what we had done. My office recalled a letter from the shadow minister for work, family and community and shadow minister for youth and early education, Tanya Plibersek. It was written in June last year and it was asking how long day care centres could access childcare coordinators and workers through skilled migration. I thought, ‘That is a bit unusual,’ because what Ms Plibersek wanted was long day care centres to access these skills through migration. She recognised more than a year ago that skilled migration could help that industry. She specifically asked whether childcare workers and coordinators were on the list and went further and said, ‘And, if not, why not?’

I advised her that childcare workers were not on the skills lists but that coordinators were on the skilled occupation list but not yet on the MODL. So we have a situation where we now put them on the MODL. Tanya Plibersek, the shadow minister, should be very happy. Mr Beazley is unhappy. He says it is a disgrace. We have not heard from Tanya Plibersek. Senator Wong has been out there trying to use this opportunity to talk about child care. Ms Plibersek has been told to be quiet—say nothing. The childcare union—