Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation.

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Does the Leader of the Opposition claim to have been misrepresented?

Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

I do seek leave to make a personal explanation.

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

You may proceed.

Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

In question time today, the Treasurer stated that the coalition's proposal to provide urgent fuel excise relief to Australians did not include a reduction in the heavy vehicle road user charge.

Mr Tony Burke (Watson, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

A point of order—

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

A point of order, the Leader of the House?

Mr Tony Burke (Watson, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Mr Speaker, this standing order can only be used where you are personally misrepresented. What has just been described is a party position. It's not—

No—please. The Leader of the Opposition is not describing anything where he was personally referenced. Unless he is personally referenced in what was said in parliament, the standing order for a personal explanation is not activated.

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

We had this issue with members of the crossbench, the member, the week before last. I'll give everyone a fair go. We'll invite the Leader of the Opposition to explain to the House, because the standing order does intersect with: when someone, an individual—not the party or the coalition—has been mentioned. Otherwise, we would be here, as we indicated to members of the crossbench, all day, if we did this. So, if the leader can explain to the House where he has been personally misrepresented—because that's the key: personal representation.

Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Correct, Mr Speaker, and the Treasurer stated that our proposal, written in my letter to the Prime Minister—my personal letter to the Prime Minister—to provide an urgent fuel excise relief to Australians, did not include a reduction in the heavy vehicle road user charge. This statement by the Treasurer is incorrect. In the letter I wrote to the Prime Minister—I personally wrote to the Prime Minister last week—I outlined our proposal to slash the road user charge. I seek leave to table my letter—my personal letter—to the Prime Minister, which will show the lengths this government will go to, to mislead Australians on their fuel security failures.

Leave not granted.

Opposition members interjecting—

Milton Dick (Speaker) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Alright. The leader has taken his personal explanation, as he is entitled to do—a little on the edges there, but we got there in the end.