No, it wasn't. Resume your seat. That was part of the question. That wasn't the question. The question was as I just stated to the House: 'Where will Australians live if the Albanese Labor government keeps sending builders broke?' The minister was in a direct sentence about the numbers of where people will live, so you couldn't be more directly relevant. I know there are other parts of the question, but you can't pick and choose what you like and what you don't like, and I can't pick and choose what the minister can and can't say. I can only make the point to the House that anyone who's listening knows she's being directly relevant. In fact, she's directly answering the question, which always helps my job. So, Minister, please continue.