My question is to the Minister for Housing. According to media reports, the Minister for Housing negatively geared an investment property, which was sold in 2023 for $1.375 million. In the last month's budget, the government broke its promise and changed the negative gearing rules. Can the minister explain why it's fair and financially sensible for her to have benefited from access to negative gearing but then pull up this ladder of opportunity from millions of aspirational Australians?