The point of order is on relevance. There's no way that the minister commenting on the opposition can be relevant to the question, which was, 'Will the minister make a decision?' Secondly, on the substance of her answer, we're not asking for an explanation on the substance of her decision. It's the timing of the decision, and the timing of the decision cannot be relevant to what the minister has rebutted. Certainly, talking about the opposition can't be relevant.