The original question was that the bill be now read a second time. To this the honourable member for Deakin moved as an amendment that all words after 'That' be omitted, with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for Brisbane has now moved, as an amendment to that amendment, that all words after 'reading' be omitted, with a view to substituting other words. The question for the House now is that amendment moved by the honourable member for Brisbane to the amendment moved by the honourable member for Deakin be disagreed to. I give the call to the honourable member for Cowper.