Thursday, 8 September 2022
I don't think that point of order was in the interests of the Manager of Opposition Business, I've got to say. But if he ever wants that to become the precedent for how we debate suspensions of standing orders we can start to go to that rule in the future, if that's where he wants to go!
Of all the questions, right on cue: who might be the person who purchased land worth $3 million, paid $30 million for it, but then, when they had to work out, 'Let's rent it back,' decided that the land was worth even less than $3 million? Then, off the back of that—