The irony! The question suggested that. That was the point. The point of the question was that I wouldn't so regard that behaviour. That is precisely what I was asked, and my answer was: where someone commits a crime, they should be charged with the crime of assault if they commit assault. That's what my view was. But I'll tell you what the ABCC have spent their money on: $500,000 of taxpayers' money on an unsuccessful case brought against a union who requested that a women's toilet be available on a worksite.