I just say to the minister: the Prime Minister did briefly compare the policies, but the question didn't ask about alternatives. In fact, it didn't—

An honourable member interjecting—

Hang on—I don't even need supportive interjections; they're unhelpful, too. It didn't even ask about the merits of spending money in a particular way. It specifically went to quotes of the Prime Minister or the number of times he'd said something, and asked him to explain how letters were signed off in a particular way. So it is very narrow.