In order to be relevant, the minister has to refer to the clause which is in the question, which says:

The FWC may approve the agreement under this section if the agreement is not a greenfields agreement and the FWC is satisfied that:

it is appropriate to do so taking into account all the circumstances, including—

And then there are four separate sections and a part (b). He has to refer to that, because that is what I quoted in the question, not whatever it is that he's going on about in order to make a point and avoid the substance of the cuts by the suspension of the better off overall test.