On the point of order: the motion to which he's referring, the suspension motion, had a clause (a) and a clause (b). The Leader of the House is right when he says this suspension is not asking for what happens in clause (a), because it's specifically asking the minister to take advantage of clause (b), which was in the motion that he should know. It was moved by the government, and he's meant to be the Leader of the House. With that, I submit it for your ruling, Mr Speaker.