I'm just going to say to the member for Isaacs: I can't see how the bulk of that question is in order when it refers to alleged conversations.

Mr Keogh interjecting—

If there are any interjections, the member for Burt can lead the way. He can leave under 94(a).

The member for Burt then left the chamber.

If people can't remember what I said yesterday in Hansard, I suggest they bring it in with them. I made a ruling before on questions and there being preambles. The bulk of that question referred to alleged private conversations that are in the media. It had a tag line at the end, and I'm ruling that question out of order. We're going to the next question.

Mr Snowdon interjecting—

The member for Lingiari can leave under 94(a). The member for Lingiari will leave immediately. If you don't leave immediately, you're going to be named.

The member for Lingiari then left the chamber.