(—) (): My question is again to the Prime Minister. I refer to the Prime Minister's previous answer. Should government policy on secret payments be extended to him? Peter and his wife were forced to live in a shed for over two years after their builder went broke and their HIH building insurance became worthless. The Prime Minister continued to live in his mansion while they had to live in a shed. Don't Peter and thousands of other victims deserve to know what role the Prime Minister played in ruining their lives? Isn't their story still continuing with his cuts to workers and families, while sending cash to big business and millionaires? (Time expired)