House debates

Wednesday, 12 August 2015

Questions without Notice

Goods and Services Tax

2:36 pm

Photo of Tony AbbottTony Abbott (Warringah, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | Hansard source

What I am not going to do is to rule out a sensible conversation about a better tax system. I am not going to rule out a sensible conversation about better taxation, a more efficient tax system, a tax system which involves a lower overall burden of tax and a tax system where taxes are lower, simpler and fairer.

I have to say: this government already has good form as a tax-cutting government. We got rid of the carbon tax. Members opposite want to put it back, at $200 a tonne. We got rid of the mining tax. Members opposite want to put it back. We have got rid of the Leader of the Opposition's 'trouser tax', and he wants to bring that back as well—the money that he was 'trousering' out of people's not-often-used bank accounts.

This is a government which is absolutely determined to get the overall burden of tax down. But, within getting taxes down, we are prepared to look at sensible suggestions from the state premiers. We do not rule things out. We do not rule things out in advance. What we do say is that we will not propose any tax change, other than a tax cut, that we do not take to the Australian people at an election, because we keep faith with the people.

I have been asked a few questions about another subject this morning. This is a government which keeps faith with the people. We made a commitment before the last election. We are going to keep that commitment for this term of parliament. And I have to say on the subject that I have been questioned about several times today: come the election, there will be a very clear choice. Members opposite want a politician's choice; this side of the parliament wants a people's choice when it comes to subjects that are as important as that.

Comments

Tibor Majlath
Posted on 9 Sep 2015 9:22 am

"This is a government which is absolutely determined to get the overall burden of tax down." For whom?

Does that even make sense? No government undertakes tax reform so that it collects less tax.

With tax revenue falling did it make sense to throw away $7 billion with the repeal of the carbon and the mining taxes?

With falling tax revenue did it make sense to give business recent tax cuts at this time?