House debates

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Bills

National Gambling Reform Bill 2012; Consideration in Detail

1:52 pm

Photo of Daryl MelhamDaryl Melham (Banks, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Hansard source

Madam Speaker, on that point of order: the member for Mackellar, if she wants to, can pursue the point under standing order 134, which says:

A Member may not vote in a division on a question about a matter, other than public policy, in which he or she has a particular direct pecuniary interest.

(b) The vote of a Member may be challenged on the grounds of the pecuniary interest by means of a substantive motion moved immediately after a division is completed. If the motion is carried, the Member's vote shall be disallowed.

If the member chooses to follow the standing orders, I will respond to the garbage she went on with in the substantive debate.

Comments

No comments