Alexander Downer (Mayo, Liberal Party, Minister for Foreign Affairs) Share this | Hansard source

I thank the member for Fisher for his question and for his interest. In terms of the assessments the government receives on the situation in Iraq, we receive constant assessments from a range of sources—obviously from our embassy in Baghdad, from various departments here in Canberra and, importantly, from the Office of National Assessments. On 31 October the member for Griffith held a doorstop. The purpose of this doorstop was to attack the Office of National Assessments. This is what he said: ‘The Office of National Assessments has not done an assessment on Iraq for more than 12 months. It has neither initiated an assessment by itself, one has not been commissioned by the government and there is none under way.’

This is taking up the point that the Leader of the Opposition made. The Labor Party makes a series of assertions, hopes that the press gallery will run them, and then the truth is examined. What is the truth here? Since action was taken to get rid of Saddam Hussein’s regime, the Office of National Assessments has produced 164 reports on Iraq. In the past 12 months the Office of National Assessments has produced 29 reports on Iraq, including four strategic assessments. So the claim made by the member for Griffith was false. This is part of the bewildering story from Labor on the whole issue of Iraq.

Yesterday we heard the Leader of the Opposition—talking of the phrase ‘inconvenient truth’—say that Australian troops would not be taken out of Iraq until it was convenient for our allies. He said that he did not want to inconvenience our allies. After question time he said that he did not really mean that. He held a doorstop. During the doorstop he was asked the very question you would expect: what would be the timeline, do you think, for the withdrawal of the troops? He said:

Very shortly. You take a look at what Howard did with our forces who were engaged actively in active combat in Afghanistan. He took them out in about a month or two. We wouldn’t require that.

Three minutes passed—there were three more questions; it probably took him a bit longer than a minute to answer each question, I would imagine—and a journalist said to him:

And you’d do that—

that is, withdraw the troops—

in less than a month, Mr Beazley?

That was what he had just said. His reply was:

You don’t put timetables on those things ...

This was three minutes later; three minutes later the policy changed again. So the journalist said:

You said less than a month or two, didn’t you?

See this speech in context