House debates

Wednesday, 15 February 2006

Questions to the Speaker

Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial responsibility for approval of RU486) Bill 2005

3:42 pm

Photo of Lindsay TannerLindsay Tanner (Melbourne, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Finance) Share this | Hansard source

I am sorry, Mr Speaker, I did not understand your response. If another member, whether with respect to this bill or another bill, decides to move in consideration in detail an amendment that arguably reflects a sentiment that was contained in a second reading amendment that has been negatived, would that member be precluded from doing so? Would they be out of order in doing so?

Comments

No comments