Senate debates

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Committees

Economics References Committee; Reference

3:45 pm

Photo of Nick XenophonNick Xenophon (SA, Independent) Share this | | Hansard source

I move:

That—

(1)   The following matter be referred to the Economics References Committee for inquiry and report by 28 February 2012:

     The impact of fixed currencies on international trade and the potential consequences on Australian jobs and industries as a result of goods being imported from countries with artificially suppressed currencies.

(2)   In undertaking the inquiry, the committee must consider:

  (a)   the effect of fixed currencies on the price of imported and exported goods;

  (b)   whether it is desirable that all countries have floated currencies;

  (c)   the ability for domestic industries to fairly compete against imported goods from countries which do not have floated currencies;

  (d)   whether there are any existing trade remedies available to support Australian industries which compete against imports from countries which do not have floated currencies;

  (e)   possible tools and trade remedies to compensate for, or otherwise redress, those currency fluctuations that may impair commitments undertaken by members in successive rounds of trade negotiations;

  (f)   whether Australia's anti-dumping regime needs to take into account the impact of fixed currencies;

  (g)   the effect that fixed currencies have on Australia's terms of trade; and

  (h)   any other related matters.

Mr Deputy President, I seek leave to make a short statement.

Photo of Stephen ParryStephen Parry (Tasmania, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Leave is granted for two minutes.

Photo of Nick XenophonNick Xenophon (SA, Independent) Share this | | Hansard source

I have been told how my colleagues will vote on this—that the government and the coalition will be opposing this motion. Just last week President Obama told us:

We need growth that is fair, where every nation plays by the rules … and where currencies are market driven so no nation has an unfair advantage.

Treasurer Swan said last month that:

It's important that all countries move to market-determined exchange rates to stop artificially depreciating their currency relative to others including the Australian dollar …

He went on to say that, if it does not happen, it will have devastating consequences for Australia. So I am hugely disappointed at the indications that I have received that the government and the opposition will oppose this motion. I am disappointed that, despite the comments from President Obama, despite comments from Treasurer Swan and despite the fact that economists around the world—including the US Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke and the RBA's Glenn Stevens—agree, for instance, that China's currency is undervalued, the government and the opposition do not seek to look further and deeper at this issue.

This motion does not call for anything other than an inquiry by the Senate Economics References Committee. It is about looking at the issue of fixed currencies, seeing what impact fixed currencies have on the price of imported and exported goods and finding out whether domestic industries are able to compete fairly against goods imported from countries that do not have floated currencies. It is baffling. These terms of reference are based on the terms of reference of the WTO's working group that will be held on this issue in 2012, at the instigation of Brazil. It is a global issue. This motion is to hold a Senate inquiry, with very broad terms of reference, into the impact fixed currencies have on imports and exports and on Australian industries. That both the government and the opposition want to bury their heads in the sand disappoints me greatly. Question put.

The Senate divided. [15:52]

(Deputy President—Senator Parry)

Question negatived.