Senate debates

Wednesday, 15 February 2017

Bills

Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Amendment Bill 2017; In Committee

6:16 pm

Photo of Michaelia CashMichaelia Cash (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Women) Share this | Hansard source

Senator Marshall, I do not have that information; however, again I go to the point that this is an opt-in scheme. If you do not want to perform Commonwealth-funded work, you do not have to. It is as simple as that. It is an opt-in scheme. Building industry participants have now had since April 2014 to bring their enterprise agreements into line with the new Building Code. I am advised that over 600 companies sent their agreements to the Department of Employment to be assessed against the advance release of the code since April 2014. Master Builders themselves have publicly stated that there are contractors that have enterprise agreements that comply with the 2016 code. As I have already stated, 16 per cent of companies have the clauses that have been referred to in relation to changing the agreements when the law changes.

Ultimately, what it comes down to is this: is the CFMEU honestly going to say no to their members having jobs? I think the answer to this question has to be no. It is up to the CFMEU. If a company with a non-code-compliant agreement has to become code compliant within this period of time in order to be able to undertake Commonwealth government work, that is the choice the CFMEU have. Do you know what I would do if I were the CFMEU? I would renegotiate as fast as I could if I was dinkum about my members actually undertaking work and having jobs, as opposed to—I have the article here somewhere—threatening to close down Australia. If this Senate today votes on this small amendment to this bill—they have openly issued a statement on 15 February. The summation of the statement is that they are so offended that they will close down Australia. I say this to the CFMEU: you can close down Australia. It is up to you. But you can also do the right thing by your members and ensure that in the event—because it may not occur—that the person or company you are working for becomes subject to the code and is required to have a code-compliant agreement, you are going to do your dammed hardest to ensure that you can front up on Monday morning with a job. That is the decision the CFMEU can make. They can shut down Australia or they can ensure that their members have jobs.

Comments

No comments