House debates

Tuesday, 21 March 2017

Questions without Notice

Racial Discrimination Act 1975

2:08 pm

Photo of Anne AlyAnne Aly (Cowan, Australian Labor Party) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister has claimed that today's changes to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act are about increasing freedom of speech. What forms of racial speech does the Prime Minister want people to be able to say that they cannot say right now?

2:09 pm

Photo of Malcolm TurnbullMalcolm Turnbull (Wentworth, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | | Hansard source

I thank the honourable member for her question. The question is really this: what is the speech that the Labor Party say would not be prohibited under the revised wording? What is it? The terms 'harass' and 'intimidate' are clear English terms. It is perfectly plain what they mean. They are to be found in many statutes. The reality is that the language 'offend, insult or humiliate' has been criticised by one expert after another. Indeed, the High Court itself has been obliged to define it as involving 'serious effects, not to be likened to mere slights'. That is Justice Susan Kiefel, our Chief Justice.

It is plain that a statute should speak in language that is clear and accurate. What we have there is a statute whose language creates a pall of insecurity over writers, students and cartoonists, because people look at those words and they say, 'So that means that any insult, any offence, any humiliation, any hurt feelings are prohibited.' It is not an academic point. We have seen it with the university students at QUT

Ms Butler interjecting

Photo of Tony SmithTony Smith (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

The member for Griffith is warned.

Photo of Malcolm TurnbullMalcolm Turnbull (Wentworth, Liberal Party, Prime Minister) Share this | | Hansard source

We have seen it with Bill Leak. A clear statute with clear language provides better protection. It provides protection both for Australians against racial vilification, but also the protection of free speech. Australians are entitled to speak freely. It is one of our fundamental rights. We are striking the balance at the right point between protection against racial vilification and protecting free speech. We have the balance right. Labor has lost the plot on this and on so many other issues.

Ms Ryan interjecting

Photo of Tony SmithTony Smith (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

The member for Lalor is warned.