Justine Elliot (Richmond, Australian Labor Party) Share this | Hansard source

I too rise to make a contribution to the address-in-reply debate. In my much earlier contributions in relation to the appropriations bill I spoke a lot about the election, and I would like to reiterate what an honour it was to have been re-elected and to thank the people of Richmond. It is indeed a real privilege to serve in this House. My electorate of Richmond is truly remarkable. It is very diverse, with people from many different backgrounds, which is something that we should celebrate, acknowledge and encourage as well. It is probably the most beautiful part of Australia. It was an honour to be returned after the election with an increased majority. As I have said to locals: 'Whether you voted for me or not, my door is always open. I am always here to help you.'

There were many issues of concern in the election, including saving Medicare and acting on climate change and housing affordability. There was a very positive response to our policies in relation to negative gearing reforms and capital gains tax reforms. There were also lots of concerns about the NBN and the need to have it rolled out in the North Coast of New South Wales, and also the need for proper funding for education.

Another major issue throughout the election, and one that has been around for a long period of time, is that of marriage equality. Today I intend to speak about my support for marriage equality and my opposition to the government's plans for a plebiscite. I, like others on this side of the House, oppose the plebiscite. That is why we voted against it. I also condemn the Prime Minister for not allowing a free vote in this House on this really important issue. In the last few days we have seen news reports and speculation that the government is considering a postal vote for the plebiscite, but make no mistake: this is nothing more than a non-compulsory, non-binding, expensive, damaging and divisive opinion poll. That is all it is.

I strongly support marriage equality and, like others on this side of the House, I want to see it in place urgently. In fact, there are bills in the parliament right now that would make marriage equality a reality.

Mr Tim Wilson interjecting—

If the Prime Minister were not so weak and so beholden to the extremists in his party, he would allow a free vote. In fact, the plebiscite was, and is, just a delaying tactic—a divisive tactic by a Prime Minister who is only concerned about his leadership.

Mr Tim Wilson interjecting—

See this speech in context