Tony Pasin (Barker, Liberal Party) Share this | Hansard source

Last evening before the adjournment debate, I was reminding those in this place that consumers have been protected from unfair contract terms since 2010. Despite, in many cases, small businesses having no more market power than consumers, the former government did not see fit to extend the protections regarding unfair contract terms to small businesses. I am grateful to the Minister for Small Business for bringing the Treasury Legislation Amendment (Small Business and Unfair Contract Terms) Bill 2015 to the House, which will see, under these new protections, a court able to strike out a term of a small business contract that is considered unfair. It obviously will thereby reduce the incentive to include and enforce unfair terms in contracts with small businesses.

In my former life I would often advise mum-and-dad small businesses not to enter into contracts which, whilst attractive in very many respects, included a term which was clearly unfair and which, if used in an inappropriate way, would do irreparable damage to their business and their operation. I am glad that those who continue in my former profession can sit with their clients in confidence and with the confidence to say that that provision will ultimately be read down by the courts.

I thought I would momentarily digress from the bill to say something about the Minister for Small Business. I think he is the political equivalent of the Energizer Bunny, but that might be for others to determine. He seems to go and go and go. I hope I will have his energy when I am his age—although he is only a few years older than me. It is important to highlight what he has been able to achieve in less than two years as the Minister for Small Business. It is also important to reflect that he served a significant period as the shadow minister for small business during a time when this nation suffered, if you like, a carousel of small business ministers.

In the 2015-16 budget the minister has delivered the nation's biggest Jobs and Small Business package. I do not like talking about the minister's package! Of course, I like talking about his small business package, which is worth $5.5 billion. The small businesses of Australia love that package about as much as a fat kid loves cake, quite frankly. They are absolutely into it. It contains a 1.5 per cent cut in the company tax rate for small businesses, or a five per cent tax discount. There is an immediate deduction for assets valued at up to $20,000. It has breathed fresh air into the small business sector. Over the winter break, I enjoyed visiting many small businesses in my electorate and reminding them that the instant asset write-off is something that they could have availed themselves of but, more importantly, that they can continue to avail themselves of over the next two financial years.

The minister was a member of the cabinet which did away with the carbon tax, saving households $550 a year. He is undertaking a review of Australia's competition laws. He has allocated $8 million over four years to transform the existing Office of the Australian Small Business Commissioner into the Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman. He has established a small business helpline, which has received some 100,000 calls in the last seven months. With the assistance of his colleagues on this side of the House, he has streamlined access to Commonwealth procurement contracts to ensure that bills are paid on time. Under the changes to the Commonwealth Contracting Suite, we are making it far easier for small business to ply their products and services to government. This includes, under his stewardship, a simplified process for tendering for contracts below $200,000.

Franchisees have also benefited from a new franchise code of conduct. An estimated 372,500 small businesses have benefited from the administrative changes to PAYG instalment thresholds that were announced with the assistance of the Minister for Small Business. As a result of the changes, 32,500 small businesses that have no GST reporting requirements will no longer have to lodge the dreaded business activity statements. The minister has assisted in announcing an entrepreneurs infrastructure package. In addition to that, we have the small business advisory services program as well as the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct to protect small suppliers from big supermarkets. In all of this work, the minister is supported by a team of colleagues who understand small business.

Last evening, I mentioned that I come from a small business background. I ran one myself. I spent many an hour in my parents' small businesses. Holidays in our household were either spent at the shop or on the farm. I often reflect on why it is that it is so important to this side of the House that we have a focus on small business. It is not, as some would suggest, because many of us have a background in small business. It is because we understand that small business is, quite frankly, the engine room of our economy. We do not necessarily see that understanding on the other side of the political divide—although, in recent times there has been, effectively, a clamouring to own this space.

I think that, through how well the small business package has been received, there has been an understanding, if you like, from both sides this place of how important the small business sector is. As I said, this was not always the case. There was a time when those opposite did not seek to mislead the Australian people into believing that they were there to support small businesses. Indeed, in July 2000 then Labor leader Kim Beazley acknowledged that the Labor Party was not the party of small business. There was a leader of the Labor Party who was prepared to be honest about the Labor Party—a much stronger Labor Party than the one that traipses its way into this place. He said:

We have never pretended to be a small business party. The Labor Party has never pretended that.

At least in 2000, the Labor Party was prepared to be honest about its propensity or otherwise to support small businesses. What we have now is a party, which is quite correctly described as the party of union officials, pretending to come into this place and be the best friend that small businesses have ever had. We know that that is not the case, and the Australian people know that that is not the case. You need not look any further than at the fact that there was a carousel of small business ministers during the failed Rudd-Gillard-Rudd years. Craig Emerson is no longer here, of course, but he was a minister for small business. He was someone who found himself on that carousel to nowhere—or at least a carousel of no progression with respect to small businesses. He said:

Labor, as a party, was born of the trade union movement. We are proud of our bonds with the trade union movement—we say it long, we say it hard and we say it often. The Liberal Party knows its origins and so do we. We recognise our origins, and we are very proud of our bonds with the trade union movement.

See, that is the problem.

At the moment, in this nation, we are having a debate about the China-Australia Free Trade Agreement. Those on this side of the place are incredibly proud of the work of the Minister for Trade and Investment, Andrew Robb, in establishing that free trade agreement. We understand that it is good for small business. We understand that it is good for farmers—particularly, I must say, those in my electorate of Barker. But those on the other side of this place are seeking to run a campaign to undermine that agreement. They seek to instil fear in ordinary every day Australians. They seek to mislead them that the free trade agreement is not what we say it is—namely, in a new globalised world, a significant economic marker which will be unequivocally good for the small businesses and the workers of Australia. They seek to mislead them that, rather, that agreement is something to be feared.

When people consider that question, I want them to think about the origins of the two major parties in this place. Our origins are deeply embedded with the small businesses of this nation. It is trite but true to say that small business is deeply embedded in the DNA of each of us. Of course, those opposite—including the member for Bendigo, who seems to be leading the charge on this, from the backbench on behalf of the Labor Party—are the party of the union movement. The member for Bendigo thinks that this place ought to be more influenced by the union movement, notwithstanding that, overall, only 12 per cent of workers find themselves as part of a union. Here is the challenge for the Labor Party: are you for jobs or are you for your union mates? Do you want to run scare campaigns or do you want to continue to work to build and strengthen the economy of Australia, because it is good for the small businesses of Australia, which, in turn, are good for the workers of Australia? I extend that challenge across the chamber and across the political divide. I hope that they fall on the side of small businesses, workers and jobs, but I suppose we will soon see.

See this speech in context