Leah Blyth (SA, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Minister for Defence Infrastructure) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source

Last week marked a significant moment for women's sport both in Australia and internationally. The International Olympic Committee has confirmed that eligibility for female categories at the Olympic Games will be restricted to biological females. This decision reinforces the fundamental principles of fairness, safety and integrity that underpin competitive sport. While this outcome will be welcomed by many female athletes, it raises a deeper question: should recognising biological reality really be considered a victory or simply the restoration of common sense? It is concerning that it has taken years of debate by governing bodies to acknowledge what has long been understood.

This decision has been driven not solely by activism but also by medical and scientific expertise. It reflects a growing recognition that biological differences between males and females have a direct and material impact on performance, safety and competitive fairness. As Australia prepares to host the Brisbane 2032 Olympic Games, this ruling provides clear guidance; however, there remain inconsistencies at a national level. Australia's Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Dr Anna Cody, has publicly stated that she does not understand the term 'biological sex' and cannot define what it constitutes to be a biological male. That position is deeply concerning on its own. It is a clear conflict to have someone in such a position who cannot recognise the very distinction that underpins female sport. If Australia is to maintain credibility as a host nation, our leadership must align with international standards and provide clarity. Dr Cody's position as it stands is untenable. We tell young girls that hard work and dedication will lead to opportunity. Maintaining female-only categories is how we protect fairness, safety and equal opportunity for women. (Time expired)