Senate debates
Tuesday, 3 March 2026
Documents
Housing Australia; Order for the Production of Documents
6:48 pm
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I did indicate to the chamber at half past six that I would deal with all of the motions and then I would go to the bills et cetera.
Nita Green (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Assistant Minister for Tourism) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I'm just seeking some direction, President. We are happy to deal with all of the motions in order, because there are no divisions tonight. I think that would be the best way to proceed.
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I had indicated to the chamber that I would deal with the motions first and then deal with the other matters. So the question is that of general business notice of motion No. 371, standing in the name of Senator Bragg.
6:49 pm
Wendy Askew (Tasmania, Liberal Party) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
At the request of Senator Bragg, I move:
That there be laid on the table by the Minister representing the Minister for Housing, by no later than midday on Wednesday, 4 March 2026:
(a) any documents relating to the results and findings of the two most recent staff surveys conducted within Housing Australia, working back from 2 March 2026; and
(b) the rectification plan in response to these staff survey results, which went to the Board and was discussed at the Housing Australia Board meeting on Tuesday, 10 February 2026.
Nita Green (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Assistant Minister for Tourism) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
by leave—I move:
Omit all words after "That", substitute:
(a) orders for the production of documents is one of the Senate's most serious powers, and should be used when all other processes have been exhausted; and
(b) Senator Bragg has been offered a briefing by the Minister for Housing.
Matt O'Sullivan (WA, Liberal Party, Shadow Assistant Minister for Fisheries and Forestry) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
Point of order on 196, tedious repetition. We're hearing tedious repetition from the government on all of these motions.
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
That was a question raised last week about reading the amendments. It is the senator's prerogative to read the amendments, and that is what she is choosing to do.
Nita Green (Queensland, Australian Labor Party, Assistant Minister for Tourism) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
I just make the point for the senator's benefit that that amendment is different from the last one. Thank you for noticing. Thanks for listening!
Sue Lines (President) Share this | Link to this | Hansard source
The question is that the amendment as moved by Senator Green to general business notice of motion No. 371 agreed to. Division required? We will defer that one.