Senate debates Motions

Employment, Western Australia: Resources Industry


Anne Urquhart

Anne Urquhart Tasmania, Australian Labor Party

12:20 pm

At the request of Senator Lines, I ask that general business notice of motion No. 1176 be taken as a formal motion.

Scott Ryan

Scott Ryan President

Is there any objection to this motion being taken as formal? There is an objection. Senator Gallagher?

Katy Gallagher

Katy Gallagher ACT, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Finance

Thank you, Mr President. Pursuant to contingent notice of motion No. 3 standing in the name of Senator Wong, I move:

That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent motion No. 1176 being moved immediately and determined without amendment or debate.

Scott Ryan

Scott Ryan President

The question is that motion be agreed to.

Katy Gallagher

Katy Gallagher ACT, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Finance

12:24 pm

I move:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Government has cut 14,500 apprentices and trainees in Western Australia since it was elected in 2013,

(ii) even before the pandemic the Government cut $3 billion from TAFE, training and apprenticeship funding and billions from university funding,

(iii) as a result of these cuts, the Western Australian resources industry faces a skill shortage of over 30,000 workers by mid-2023, and

(iv) rather than training locals, the Morrison Government has added a range of mining and engineering occupations to the Priority Migration Skilled Occupation List; and

(b) calls on the Morrison Government to urgently fix the resources industry skill shortage in Western Australia, by investing in training for Western Australians.

Jonathon Duniam

Jonathon Duniam Tasmania, Liberal Party, Assistant Minister for Forestry and Fisheries

I table a government statement in relation to this motion.

Pauline Hanson

Pauline Hanson Queensland, Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party

by leave—I table a short statement.

Scott Ryan

Scott Ryan President

The question is that motion No. 1176 be agreed to.