Senate debates

Wednesday, 31 July 2019

Questions without Notice

Conservative Political Action Conference

2:51 pm

Photo of Kristina KeneallyKristina Keneally (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister representing the Prime Minister, Senator Cormann. I refer to the CPAC conference to be held in Australia next week, which will feature many right-wing extremists, including failed Ukip leadership candidate Raheem Kassam, who has campaigned against Muslim immigration, labelled the Koran fundamentally evil and attacked the BBC for tranny pushing. Also joining Mr Kassam is guest speaker Senator Stoker. Does the minister believe it is appropriate for Senator Stoker to attend the event alongside Mr Kassam?

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

That is essentially the same question as what was asked previously. I have taken that question on notice, and I will add that to the question on notice.

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Keneally, a supplementary question?

2:52 pm

Photo of Kristina KeneallyKristina Keneally (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

After SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon suffered a miscarriage, Mr Kassam tweeted, 'Can someone just like tape Nicola Sturgeon's mouth shut and her legs so she can't reproduce.' The member for Hughes, Craig Kelly MP, will also be attending this conference. Does the minister support the member for Hughes's decision to appear alongside Mr Kassam?

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

The comments that Senator Keneally just quoted are disgraceful and highly objectionable and completely outrageous that, of course, I entirely abhor, and I'm sure anyone in this Senate chamber abhors. I don't think that that is a partisan position. Those are disgusting comments and I reject them. I reject them entirely and utterly.

Now, having said that, I am not aware of this conference. I don't have the information in relation to this conference. I have already taken these matters on notice. I will just make a general point that, just because you are at an event somewhere, you're not expected to agree with everything that everybody says that is at the same event. Let me tell you, all of us have been at events in our electorates where we've come across people who have made highly objectionable comments. (Time expired)

Photo of Scott RyanScott Ryan (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Keneally, a final supplementary question?

2:53 pm

Photo of Kristina KeneallyKristina Keneally (NSW, Australian Labor Party, Deputy Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) Share this | | Hansard source

Will the Prime Minister request the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs review Mr Kassam's visa, similar to the action taken against other right-wing extremists like Milo Yiannopoulos, David Icke and Gavin McInnes?

2:54 pm

Photo of Mathias CormannMathias Cormann (WA, Liberal Party, Vice-President of the Executive Council) Share this | | Hansard source

As Senator Keneally would know, or should know, the Australian government—that is, governments of either persuasion—does not comment on individual cases. What I would say is that all non-citizens entering Australia must meet and continue to meet the character requirements set out in the Migration Act 1958. There are strong provisions under the act to refuse or cancel a visa where a person is found not to be of good character. Any application lodged with the department about visitors who may hold controversial views will be considered, balancing any risk they may pose with Australia's well-established freedom of speech and freedom of beliefs. All visitors to Australia are expected to obey Australian laws and satisfy the character requirements of the Migration Act, but I do make the point again that, consistent with the appropriate practices of governments of both political persuasions, we do not comment on individual cases.