Senate debates Budget

Budget


Larissa Waters

Larissa Waters Queensland, Australian Greens

4:00 pm

I move:

That the Senate—

(a)   notes:

(i)   how well positioned Australia is to take advantage of the huge jobs and commercial opportunities from investing in research and development in clean energy technologies,

(ii)   That the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) is the institution that will enable us to be global leaders in clean technology innovation, and

(iii)   That the 2014 Budget proposed $1.3 billion in cuts to ARENA for the financial years 2017-18 to 2021-22 which have so far been blocked but which have caused considerable uncertainty for ARENA; and

(b)   resolves That the $1.5 billion of currently legislated funding for ARENA for the financial years 2016-17 to 2021-22 will not be reduced.

Scott Ryan

Scott Ryan Victoria, Liberal Party

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Stephen Parry

Stephen Parry President

Leave is granted for one minute.

Scott Ryan

Scott Ryan Victoria, Liberal Party

The motion by the Greens fails to mention and Turnbull coalition government established the $1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund. This will be jointly managed by the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and the Australian Renewable Energy Agency. The fund will support emerging technologies to make the leap from demonstration to commercial development. By offering innovative equity and debt products, the fund will attract better quality projects. This is another example of the Turnbull coalition government providing innovation and new economic opportunities, enhancing our productivity while also protecting the environment and reducing emissions. In contrast, the Greens are only interest in empty rhetoric with no consideration for what will actually drive investment in new energy.

Hansard source

Andrew JACKSON: Senator Ryan is correct the Greens are only interested in empty rhetoric but he is wrong that "they give no consideration for what actually drives ... investment". In fact the Greens spend a lot of t5ime considering investment and then do all in their power to ensure that investment does not occur. They actually want NO INVESTMENT other than in the growth of inner city parasitism. They spend more time on SSM than they do on greenery, and they show their support for trees by ensuring that the blocks of flats where most of them live have no trees. However... Continue reading

Link to this
Stephen Parry

Stephen Parry President

The question is the motion moved by Senator Waters be agreed to.