Senate debates Motions

United Nations Environment Programme


Christine Milne

Christine Milne Tasmania, Australian Greens

3:49 pm

On behalf of Senator Waters, I move:

That the Senate—

(a) notes that:

(i) the Minister for the Environment (Mr Hunt) announced $6 million to combat illegal logging at the Asia Pacific Rainforest Summit,

(ii) the Minister did not mention That the Government would simultaneously cut Australia's commitment to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) by 80 per cent, or $4 million, and

(iii) Australia benefits from leveraging over $500 million in contributions from other countries to the UNEP in a range of areas, including air pollution, ozone depletion and biodiversity loss;

(b) condemns the Government's sleight of hand which has further embarrassed Australia on the global stage; and

(c) calls on the Government to restore Australia's financial commitment to the UNEP.

Mitch Fifield

Mitch Fifield Victoria, Liberal Party, Assistant Minister for Social Services

I seek leave to make a short statement.

Stephen Parry

Stephen Parry President

Leave is granted for one minute.

Mitch Fifield

Mitch Fifield Victoria, Liberal Party, Assistant Minister for Social Services

The government continues to support UNEP and is making a contribution; however, as we fix Labor's budget mess we are reprioritising our spending and instead are investing in practical action for coral reef protection within our region and combating illegal logging of the great rainforests of the Asia-Pacific. That totals $12 million. Australia is playing its part in an effective international response to climate change through direct action, including our $2.5 billion Emissions Reduction Fund, international engagement and our aid program. The Australian government is contributing $93 million to the Global Environment Facility. The Global Environment Facility will contribute to sustainable economic growth, which is critical to raising living standards in poor communities dependent on the natural environment.

Hansard source

Charlie Schroeder: That's very much giving overtly and removing covertly. More has been removed and what has been removed is more important than what has been given. A common ploy of government. We need some of the Australian environment watchdogs that have been removed or emasculated back with full powers. Reef protection should make any idea of coal ports near it a definite non-starter. However, because of the liberal and destructive Liberal party policies on environment, every company and organisation thinks that Australia will bend or break any environmental safeguard of the past. So they apply to get... Continue reading

Link to this
Stephen Parry

Stephen Parry President

The question is that the motion moved by Senator Milne be agreed to.