Senate debates

Thursday, 6 March 2014

Questions without Notice

Future of Financial Advice

3:00 pm

Photo of David FawcettDavid Fawcett (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

) ( ): Is the Assistant Treasurer aware of incorrect claims that the government's Future of Financial Advice reforms wind back consumer protections? Can the Assistant Treasurer advise—

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! On my left! Senator Cameron! Senator Fawcett is entitled to be heard in silence.

Photo of David FawcettDavid Fawcett (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Can the Assistant Treasurer advise the Senate of the government's response to these false allegations?

3:01 pm

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

I can inform the honourable member and the Senate that there have been a number of incorrect claims in this regard. We are not winding back the consumer protection provisions under FOFA.

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

No, we are not. Our reform package of amendments is designed to reduce red tape and regulatory—

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Sinodinos, resume your seat. I remind honourable senators that in another three or four minutes they will have the chance to debate this. It is disorderly to interject while the minister is answering the question. The minister is entitled to be heard in silence.

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

We are retaining the essential elements of FOFA. What we are doing is removing some unnecessary red tape and regulatory burden. What we are doing is clarifying the operation of FOFA and more effectively aligning the legislation with what was envisaged in the original parliamentary report.

Opposition senators interjecting

These clarifications were set out in the dissenting report issued by coalition senators to that PJC report. All of the essential consumer protections will remain. Many of them are enshrined not just in the FOFA legislation but also in the Corporations Law and in the common law.

3:03 pm

Photo of David FawcettDavid Fawcett (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Can the Assistant Treasurer advise the Senate why the government is planning to amend the general 'best interest' rule in the legislation and how this will affect the quality and accessibility of financial advice in Australia?

Honourable Senators:

Honourable senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

When there is silence we will proceed. Senator Cormann and Senator Cameron, come to order! Senator Conroy! Senator Sinodinos has the call.

3:04 pm

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

In relation to the 'best interest' duty: those opposite should understand that what was put into the legislation was seven steps that financial advisers were being guided to act upon if they were to act in the best interests of clients. The reason that was done is that financial advisers were seeking clear guidance on how to perform those functions. In other words, it was made a safe harbour to give them guidance. It was not put in as further protection for consumers. What happened is that the seventh part of the protection that was put in was a catch-all that effectively undermined the guidance that was provided by the first six steps on how a financial adviser would meet the 'best interest' test. On top of that, nothing has been altered, requiring that advice be appropriate to the client—

Honourable Senators:

Honourable senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! There are interjections on both sides. It is disorderly. Senator Sinodinos is entitled to be heard in silence.

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

There are a number of other duties the adviser must adhere to, including that the advice be appropriate for the client— (Time expired)

3:05 pm

Photo of David FawcettDavid Fawcett (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. Can the Assistant Treasurer advise the Senate how the proposed reforms to the Future of Financial Advice will cut red tape and compliance costs to businesses—

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! On my left!

Photo of David FawcettDavid Fawcett (SA, Liberal Party) Share this | | Hansard source

and in turn deliver savings to customers?

3:06 pm

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

The previous government's FOFA reforms involved regulatory over-reach. Our reforms will save industry an estimated $90 million—

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

On my left: I realise it is Thursday afternoon and that some people are getting excited, but Senator Sinodinos is entitled to be heard in silence.

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

Our reforms will save industry and therefore consumers an estimated $90 million in implementation costs and will reduce the annual compliance burden by—

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

When there is silence on my left, we will proceed.

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

There will be annual compliance savings of around $190 million a year. The reason for that is that we will be removing excessive requirements, like an opt-in requirement where you have to opt in every two years, when at any time—

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Senator Sinodinos, resume your seat. When there is silence on my left, we will proceed. It is disorderly, and it is not helping the conduct of question time.

Photo of Arthur SinodinosArthur Sinodinos (NSW, Liberal Party, Assistant Treasurer) Share this | | Hansard source

We will remove the annual fee disclosure requirements for pre 1 July 2013 clients because we were told the costs of going back to reconstruct that sort of material would make it potentially prohibitive; the cost would be too high. Furthermore, your government—the previous government— (Time expired)

Photo of Eric AbetzEric Abetz (Tasmania, Liberal Party, Minister for Employment) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, it is with deep regret that I ask that further questions be placed on the Notice Paper.