Senate debates

Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Questions without Notice

Australian Defence Force Academy

2:27 pm

Photo of David JohnstonDavid Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Defence) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Defence, Senator Carr. I refer the minister to the decision of the Minister for Defence to abuse his statutory powers in removing Commodore Kafer from his position at ADFA. Under what statutory authority did the minister have the power to remove this highly respected commandant?

2:28 pm

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Defence Materiel) Share this | | Hansard source

This is a matter which has been the subject of ongoing inquiry. The minister took the view that it was appropriate, in the circumstances, that there be a change in administrative arrangements, and on his own authority he chose to take the actions that he did.

2:29 pm

Photo of David JohnstonDavid Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Defence) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. The minister has had the Kirkham report into this matter since December last year. Why has the minister sat on this report for more than two months?

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Defence Materiel) Share this | | Hansard source

The minister is giving this issue very careful consideration.

Opposition Senators:

Opposition senators interjecting

Photo of John HoggJohn Hogg (President) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! Senator Carr is entitled to be heard in silence.

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Defence Materiel) Share this | | Hansard source

There are a number of privacy and legal issues which need to be addressed and it would be premature to discuss the timing of the arrangements of any possible release of the report.

2:30 pm

Photo of David JohnstonDavid Johnston (WA, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Defence) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr President, I ask a further supplementary question. The highly respected Australian Defence Association have publicly said that Minister Smith has put his personal party leadership ambitions ahead of proper ministerial supervision of Australia's defence efforts. They have not said this lightly. When will this uninterested minister reinstate the highly competent and respected officer to his rightful position, as the Kirkham report is known to have recommended?

Photo of Kim CarrKim Carr (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Defence Materiel) Share this | | Hansard source

I think that the political comment that you have made, Senator, is a matter for your judgment. It has no bearing whatsoever on the minister's consideration of these issues. I have indicated to you that the minister is considering these questions very carefully, that there are a number of privacy and legal issues that need to be addressed and that it would be premature to release the report. As to any other speculation you may choose to articulate, it is completely irrelevant to the consideration of these matters in the terms that I have outlined.