Senate debates

Tuesday, 10 September 2019

Bills

Royal Commissions Amendment (Private Sessions) Bill 2019; In Committee

12:03 pm

Photo of Zed SeseljaZed Seselja (ACT, Liberal Party, Assistant Minister for Finance, Charities and Electoral Matters) Share this | Hansard source

I table a supplementary explanatory memorandum relating to the government amendments to be moved to this bill, and I seek leave to move government amendments (2), (3), (4), (5), (7) and (8) together.

Leave granted.

I move:

(2) Schedule 1, items 7 to 13, page 4 (line 18) to page 6 (line 10), omit the items, substitute:

7 Section 6OB

Repeal the section, substitute:

6OB Power to hold private sessions

Who may hold a private session

  (1) If a Royal Commission is constituted by 2 or more members, the following members may hold a private session for the Commission to obtain information in relation to matters into which the Commission is inquiring:

(a) the Chair of the Commission;

(b) a member who is authorised in writing by the Chair of the Commission.

  (2) If a Royal Commission is constituted by a sole Commissioner, the sole Commissioner may hold a private session for the Commission to obtain information in relation to matters into which the Commission is inquiring.

Number of members who may hold a private session

  (3) A private session held under subsection (1) may be held only by one or 2 members.

Conduct of a private session

  (4) If a private session is held for a Royal Commission under subsection (1), any member of the Commission holding the private session may (subject to the Letters Patent establishing the Commission and Division 3) determine any matters relating to the conduct of the private session, having regard to any directions given by the Chair of the Commission.

  (5) If a private session is held for a Royal Commission under subsection (2), the sole Commissioner holding the private session may (subject to the Letters Patent establishing the Commission and Division 3) determine any matters relating to the conduct of the private session.

(3) Schedule 1, item 16, page 6 (line 24), omit "person", substitute "member".

(4) Schedule 1, item 16, page 7 (line 1), omit "person", substitute "member".

(5) Schedule 1, item 21, page 7 (lines 16 to 18), omit the item, substitute:

21 Paragraph 6OC(6 ) ( a)

Omit "of the Child Sexual Abuse Royal Commission".

(7) Schedule 1, item 27, page 8 (lines 11 to 13), omit the item, substitute:

27 Section 6OG

Omit "of the Child Sexual Abuse Royal Commission".

(8) Schedule 1, item 42, page 12 (line 2), omit "6OF,".

We also oppose schedule 1 in the following terms:

(1) Schedule 1, item 5, page 4 (lines 6 to 11), TO BE OPPOSED.

[who may hold private sessions]

(6) Schedule 1, items 24 and 25, page 7 (line 29) to page 8 (line 7), TO BE OPPOSED.

I was reading from the wrong area on the bill, so I do apologise to the Senate. The bill passed in the other place made provisions for the chair or sole commissioner to authorise assistant commissioners to hold private sessions. The bill placed limits on the circumstances in which an assistant commissioner could be authorised to hold a private session. Only appropriately qualified and senior staff of the commission could be authorised as assistant commissioners. The bill made a presumption that a private session must be held by a commissioner unless the chair or sole commissioner considered that there are circumstances that justified assistant commissioners holding private sessions. This provision was intended to give more flexibility to a commission. It was not envisaged that the power would be necessary for multi-panel inquiries with many commissioners. It may have been useful to a royal commission, with only one or two commissioners, to hold more private sessions. However, the government has listened to stakeholders and determined that only royal commissioners should be empowered to hold private sessions.

It is important that individuals who may share highly sensitive and personal information in a private session feel confident in the process. That is why the government has circulated amendments to remove the provisions relating to assistant commissioners. This approach is consistent with the private session regime adopted by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. The effect of the amendments is that only a sole commissioner, the chair of a multi-member commission or a commissioner authorised by the chair is empowered to hold private sessions.

Comments

No comments