Senate debates

Thursday, 29 November 2018

Business

Days and Hours of Meeting

9:33 am

Photo of Jacinta CollinsJacinta Collins (Victoria, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Cabinet Secretary) Share this | Hansard source

I move the amendment to government business notice of motion No. 1 that has been circulated in the chamber:

omit:

"Budget sittings:

Tuesday, 2 April to Thursday, 4 April

Autumn sittings (2):

Monday, 15 April to Thursday, 18 April

Winter sittings:

Monday, 13 May to Thursday 16 May

Monday, 17 June to Thursday 20 June

Monday, 24 June to Thursday 27 June"

substitute:

"Budget sittings:

Tuesday, 2 April to Wednesday, 3 April

Winter sittings:

Monday, 13 May to Thursday 16 May

Tuesday, 28 May to Thursday, 30 May

Monday, 3 June to Thursday, 6 June

Monday, 17 June to Thursday 20 June

Monday, 24 June to Thursday 27 June"

This amendment seeks to omit the sitting week proposed for Monday, 15 April to Thursday, 18 April and substitute two new sitting weeks from Tuesday, 28 May to Thursday, 30 May and Monday, 3 June to Thursday, 6 June 2019. It also omits the sitting day scheduled for Thursday, 4 April 2018, essentially to mirror arrangements that were put in place in 2016 to ensure that there was some budget accountability in advance of the election on that occasion.

The amendment works in tandem with the opposition's proposed amendment to government business notice of motion No. 2 relating to the scheduling of estimates hearings. We did seek for the government to progress this matter at this stage, given that we're addressing both issues, but at this point, unfortunately, the government will still proceed with that matter at formal business, where we will deny formality, and it will be debated later in the day—just so senators understand the process.

As I said, this particular amendment to the sitting schedule works in tandem with the opposition's proposed amendment to government business notice of motion No. 2 relating to the scheduling of estimates hearings. That amendment proposes two days of budget estimates hearings in budget week followed by two weeks of budget estimates hearings in the fortnight immediately following the budget. The opposition regrets that it takes this step to move amendments to the sitting calendar.

As Senator Fifield said, the orthodox and conventional approach is for the government of the day to determine their sitting calendar. We recognise the right of the government of the day to propose such. However, this government has abused this right by manipulating the sitting calendar to suit its timetable for an election, and it is clearly ducking for cover. It is not acceptable that there will be an unprecedented eight-week gap—think of that, senators—between the date on which the budget will be delivered and the start of budget estimates. This government has brought forward the budget week but it's put back any accountability of such budget. In fact, there's a possibility that the appropriation bills may even pass before the proposed commencement of budget estimates, defeating the point of the process entirely—some might say defeating the point of the Senate entirely.

The opposition will be moving to shift the budget estimates hearings to where they belong: right after the budget. Accordingly, we've moved this amendment to the motion proposing the ordinary sitting days for 2019 in order to facilitate that change, which will be made by a separate amendment to the later motion. At this stage, I'd also like to assure the leaders of non-government parties and Independent senators that the opposition will work with them to facilitate time for those senators to make their budget reply, another very important element of Senate activity with respect to a government budget. We will facilitate budget reply speeches in budget week, as would ordinarily be the case. I commend the amendment to the Senate.

Comments

No comments