Nick Xenophon (SA, Independent) Share this | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Senator Ludwig. In relation to the cost recovery of export fees from exporters, the department's website states quite clearly that the cost-recovery process must follow the protocols set out in the Australian government cost-recovery guidelines from July 2005. Under these guidelines specific requirements are set out for agencies with significant cost-recovery arrangements. Can the minister confirm whether DAFF's cost-recovery processes are considered significant and, if so, whether the protocols are adhered to? Can the minister also provide advice on whether the protocols are considered legally binding? Can the minister explained why Riverland lime producers Mick and Tanya Punturiero have seen an increase in inspection fees from $550-$8,530, which has destroyed their export market to New Zealand?