Senate debates

Thursday, 25 November 2010

Business

Suspension of Standing Orders

9:47 am

Photo of Mitch FifieldMitch Fifield (Victoria, Liberal Party, Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) Share this | Hansard source

Senator Conroy had to step in after Senator Brown bungled procedurally. Clearly Senator Conroy did not read the comments of Mr Swan, mentioned on the front page of the Australian newspaper yesterday, which were to steer clear of the Greens. The Labor Party and the Greens are in this place in an alliance. It is an alliance against accountability; it is an alliance against transparency, and that is what we saw last night. We are seeing another instalment of that today, with Senator Ludwig seeking to suspend standing orders to introduce a motion to vary the order of business today. There is a well-established pattern of business in this place, and it is the government’s obligation to manage their program within that established program, which it has failed to do.

Alongside that, we on this side of the chamber are not prepared to be party to any rush of consideration of the telecommunications legislation, which has taken up part of this week. That legislation actually has not received significant scrutiny. It is not for any lack of trying on this side of the chamber. It is because the parliament and the Australian people have been denied basic information which they need when assessing something of this magnitude—when assessing a $42 billion or $43 billion government program. We wanted the business case but that has been denied. We have been given an abridged version of it but that is not adequate; it is not sufficient. We have argued time and again that something of this magnitude should go to the Productivity Commission.

Even the $16 billion Building the Education Revolution program at least gets the scrutiny of the hapless Mr Orgill. Even that program gets a modicum of objective assessment. But for something that will cost $42 billion this government seeks to deny even the most basic elementary scrutiny. We are not minded to support—and we will not be supporting—the suspension of standing orders to consider a motion to vary the hours in this place—

Comments

No comments