Senate debates

Monday, 30 November 2009

Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Australian Climate Change Regulatory Authority Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — Customs) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — Excise) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (Charges — General) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS Fuel Credits) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS Fuel Credits) (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Excise Tariff Amendment (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Customs Tariff Amendment (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) Bill 2009 [No. 2]; Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Amendment (Household Assistance) Bill 2009 [No. 2]

Adoption of Report

9:13 pm

Photo of Nick XenophonNick Xenophon (SA, Independent) Share this | Hansard source

I indicate that I will be not be supporting this amendment. I think in an interjection by Senator Feeney earlier about the whole idea of a royal commission he said that the IPCC has done that. I think he is right. There have been enough peer-reviewed articles to indicate that climate change is real. There are other scientists who disagree, but the overwhelming scientific evidence is that we must take action. The approach suggested by Senator Fielding, with respect to him, is not the way forward. In any event, from a procedural point of view, the fact is that we can call on the government to have a royal commission but we cannot force the government to have a royal commission. Similarly, we can call on the government to have a Productivity Commission inquiry but it is for the government, for the Assistant Treasurer, to actually order the commission to undertake such an inquiry—

Comments

No comments