Senate debates

Thursday, 7 December 2006

Crimes Amendment (Bail and Sentencing) Bill 2006

Consideration of House of Representatives Message

8:13 pm

Photo of Chris EllisonChris Ellison (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice and Customs) Share this | Hansard source

That is a different question, and to that extent I would have to check. I will have to take that on notice. But, certainly, in relation to the question as to whether officials will be able to consider religious beliefs, the answer is yes. A constable, senior constable or magistrate will still be able to consider religious beliefs where appropriate in deciding whether there is a less intrusive way of obtaining a person’s DNA. We believe that covers it. There are a range of options available for collecting forensic evidence. If a person holds a religious belief then that should be a factor in deciding which of those options should be chosen. So that will be considered. This draws an appropriate balance between protecting religious beliefs on the one hand and enforcing the criminal law on the other.

Comments

No comments