Senate debates

Wednesday, 8 November 2006

Crimes Amendment (Bail and Sentencing) Bill 2006

In Committee

11:37 am

Photo of Chris EllisonChris Ellison (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for Justice and Customs) Share this | Hansard source

At the outset can I say that the government is opposed to the Democrats proposal. I think I have covered that adequately in previous debate on the issue. Senator Ludwig has raised a question about section 19B of the Crimes Act 1914, which deals with the discharge of offenders without proceeding to conviction. That provides:

(1) Where:

(a)   a person is charged before a court with a federal offence or federal offences; and

(b)   the court is satisfied, in respect of that charge or more than one of those charges, that the charge is proved, but is of the opinion, having regard to:

(i)    the character, antecedents, cultural background, age, health or mental condition of the person—

and other factors—

that it is inexpedient to inflict any punishment, or to inflict any punishment other than a nominal punishment, or that it is expedient to release the offender on probation ...

It then provides a discretion for the court, by order, to dismiss the charge or charges or discharge the person without proceeding to conviction. There are a number of other provisions in that section.

In relation to why that has not been amended I will take advice from the officials. I understand that the section deals with minor offences, which would not be contemplated here. I will take that on notice and provide the committee with further details. Perhaps we can deal with the Democrats proposal which we are facing now. The government has its amendments and I can deal with this question more fully during the debate on those two amendments.

Comments

No comments