Senate debates

Thursday, 9 February 2006

Adjournment

Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial responsibility for approval of RU486) Legislation

5:53 pm

Photo of Ian CampbellIan Campbell (WA, Liberal Party, Minister for the Environment and Heritage) Share this | Hansard source

No, but can I say that I think it is worth reflecting on both the words of Senator Parry and the earlier words of Senator Humphries in relation to the stresses and pressures of the job and the need to treat with respect and courtesy not only colleagues but also all of those people we encounter in our lives, and try to smile at them and say ‘G’day’ from time to time. It is easy to get carried away with the importance of what we do and not share the time for a smile. This debate has had generally very good elements and some that have been a little less fortunate. There is a tendency, with some of these debates, for people to become very self-righteous and sanctimonious and to reflect on other people’s morals and consciences. I think that is very much the exception, but I wanted to get that off my chest.

But, generally speaking, it is wonderful to be part of such a great democratic institution and a member of such a great democratic society. We have all received enormous numbers of emails, carefully thought out and crafted letters, and endless telephone calls. And as we move around the community we have also bumped into people who know that we are members of the Senate and want to share their views with us on an issue that is very important to so many people. To come into this place, have a debate, deal with it in a sensible and timely way and then move on is a quite wonderful thing. It makes me feel proud to be part of this institution and proud to be a citizen of such a wonderful democracy. So I commend Senator Parry’s contribution and look forward to your next statement, Mr President.

Comments

No comments