Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) | Link to this | Hansard source

My question is to the Prime Minister. Will the Prime Minister confirm that Australians will pay $77 billion more tax than they get back?

Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) | Link to this | Hansard source

I'll do my best to answer a question that didn't really make sense. It didn't really make sense. Then again, it doesn't make sense to oppose income tax cuts, but that is what they have done time after time after time. They oppose income tax cuts, and the other thing that they oppose is the real wage increases that the minister just spoke about—that 4.75 per cent increase in the minimum wage that brings the increases for those on minimum wages and awards to $12,000 since we came to office. We want Australians to earn more and to keep more of what they earn, which is why consistently we have made submissions to the Fair Work Commission arguing for increases in real wages, something those opposite have never ever done.

Milton Dick (Speaker) | Link to this | Hansard source

The Leader of the Opposition, on a point of order?

Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) | Link to this | Hansard source

On relevance, the question was about Labor's $77 billion of tax increases.

Milton Dick (Speaker) | Link to this | Hansard source

Yes, the Prime Minister was asked a yes/no question about the $77 billion that the opposition is claiming the government is receiving back. I know you want a yes/no answer, but I can't make the Prime Minister do that. He wasn't asked about other policies than that one.

Mr Tony Burke (Watson, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House) | Link to this | Hansard source

The question went to how much tax people pay and how much they get back. It worked; that's exactly what was asked.

Angus Taylor (Hume, Liberal Party, Leader of the Opposition) | Link to this | Hansard source

It was!

Mr Tony Burke (Watson, Australian Labor Party, Leader of the House) | Link to this | Hansard source

Just acknowledging the frustration of the Leader of the Opposition, the words that you say into the microphone all form part of the question. When the words finish with 'and what they get back', then the full relationship is able to be answered and is relevant.

Dan Tehan (Wannon, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction) | Link to this | Hansard source

On the point of order, we want the Prime Minister to try and be relevant. It was a very tight question about $77 billion. Are you paying more taxes than $77 billion, yes or no? It's in your budget papers.

Milton Dick (Speaker) | Link to this | Hansard source

The question to the Prime Minister was 'will the Prime Minister confirm that Australians will pay $77 billion more tax than they get back?' It's a figure that he's given. I'll have to listen carefully to make sure he's talking about what—

Yes, thank you, Leader of the Opposition. We're dealing with this. It's a yes/no that you require. I can't get him to do that, but I can make sure he's being directly relevant to the tax question he was asked about that figure.

Honourable members interjecting—

We're just going to take the temperature down a little bit. There's far too much noise this week already. I want the House to settle, and we'll hear from the Prime Minister.

Anthony Albanese (Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Prime Minister) | Link to this | Hansard source

We on this side of the House, on Thursday, we'll be voting for income tax cuts. Those on that side will be only voting for higher income taxes, like they did before the last election, like they did when we changed stage 3 of the tax cuts. Consistently they have voted for higher taxes and lower wages for working Australians. We on this side of the House stand for working Australians. We stand for higher wages, for lower income taxes and for people to earn more and keep more of what they earn.