House debates

Tuesday, 14 November 2023

Questions without Notice

Immigration Detention

2:37 pm

Photo of Dan TehanDan Tehan (Wannon, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship) Share this | | Hansard source

My question is to the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs. When did the minister seek advice about a legislative fix to the High Court decision?

2:38 pm

Photo of Andrew GilesAndrew Giles (Scullin, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs) Share this | | Hansard source

Thank you, shadow minister, for your question. Immediately after the decision, we sought advice on its implications. In the days—

Opposition Members:

Opposition members interjecting

Photo of Milton DickMilton Dick (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

Order! The minister will pause. The question has been asked in silence; I want to hear the answer in silence as well. I give the call to the minister.

Photo of Andrew GilesAndrew Giles (Scullin, Australian Labor Party, Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs) Share this | | Hansard source

We sought advice on its implications, and that advice contemplated the work that was done in advance of the decision in contemplation of it. I've spoken on at least three occasions, as has the Minister for Home Affairs, about some of the practical steps we sought to have in place in the event of an adverse judgement. We also sought advice prior to the hearing on the options that would be available, depending on the various outcomes of the decision.

I remind the shadow minister—and, indeed, all members—that we're yet to receive the reasons for the High Court decision. However, as I said yesterday morning, and as my statement together with the Minister for Home Affairs said earlier today, we have always been looking at all regulatory and legislative options which are available.

Photo of Milton DickMilton Dick (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

The minister will pause. Member for Wannon, this had better be on relevance or another point of order.

Photo of Dan TehanDan Tehan (Wannon, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship) Share this | | Hansard source

Mr Speaker, the question was, 'When'—

Photo of Dan TehanDan Tehan (Wannon, Liberal Party, Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship) Share this | | Hansard source

No, relevance. Relevance. The question was—

Photo of Milton DickMilton Dick (Speaker) Share this | | Hansard source

You're supposed to say, 'I'm rising on a point of order. It's on—'. Had the minister concluded his answer? He's concluded his answer. I just remind the member for Wannon: if you get the call, always state what the point of order is. Don't just start saying what you feel.