The original question was that the bill be read a second time, to which the honourable member for Moncrieff moved, as amendment, that all words after 'that' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The honourable member for Griffith has moved, as an amendment to that amendment, that all words after 'reading' be omitted with a view to substituting other words. The immediate question is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Griffith be disagreed to.

The immediate question is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Griffith be disagreed to.

The question is that the amendment moved by the honourable member for Moncrieff be disagreed.