House debates Questions without Notice

Prime Minister

Monday, 26 November 2018 House of Representatives

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Tourism

2:51 pm

My question is addressed to the Prime Minister, and I refer to various answers he has given in this chamber to, 'Why isn't Malcolm Turnbull still the Prime Minister of Australia?' If the Prime Minister won't tell Australians why he's got his current job, will he at least say why he was sacked from his role as head of Tourism Australia by former coalition government tourism minister Fran Bailey in the Howard government?

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

I'm not calling the Prime Minister straightaway. I'm just pondering the relevance of the last part of that question. It needs to relate to the Prime Minister's responsibilities, not to—

Honourable members interjecting

He wasn't then, no.

Honourable members interjecting

As generous as I am, I can't see that question being in order. The member for Grayndler on a point of order?

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Tourism

Thanks, Mr Speaker. The point of order is with regards to why the question was, at least in part, in order—

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

Yes—

Government members interjecting

Hang on. Members on my right. I want to keep hearing the member for Grayndler. I'm liking what I hear so far.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Tourism

Because I was very conscious, Mr Speaker, of your role and the potential for a ruling from you, which is why it was framed in terms of referring to previous answers that he's given day after day after day when we've asked each and every day why he's there and not Malcolm Turnbull. The question went to that—

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

I don't need you to repeat every question you've asked; that's okay.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Tourism

No, no, I'm just referring to the number of occasions on which it's been asked. That part of the question is certainly in order. I think he might want to have the opportunity to clear the air about the second part on why he lost his job.

Government members interjecting

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

Members on my right. The Leader of the House?

Christopher Pyne

Christopher Pyne Sturt, Liberal Party, Leader of the House

Mr Speaker, on your ruling and the member for Grayndler's point of order, you have previously said that questions that have a fig leaf of relevance—or in this case, a small tree frond of relevance—should not therefore be in order when the rest of the question is quite clearly not in order, and is really, in this case, designed to be a smear as opposed to a question.

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

That's right. I'm glad that the member for Grayndler concedes that part of the question wasn't in order.

Anthony Albanese

Anthony Albanese Grayndler, Australian Labor Party, Shadow Minister for Tourism

It was an opportunity.

Tony Smith

Tony Smith Speaker

He's been generous in saying he's providing that opportunity, but, given that a question's been framed that's partly deliberately not in order, I'm just not going to allow it. The member for Dunkley.